ma *******@gmail.com 写道：

因为动态页面在搜索引擎中没有得到很好的索引，所以有一个不错的API来解析通过网站和自动编写页面
作为简单的HTML？我注意到一些WordPress和Blogger
作者将他们的帖子作为简单的html提供。

任何想法？

谢谢。

是什么让你认为动态页面索引不好？我有几个网站

，动态页面索引得很好。


所有搜索引擎看到的都是生成的HTML。那么那个和静态html页面之间的区别是什么（除了后者将会在生成后的几分钟内显示为$​​ b $ b）。静态页面将有不同的URL，因此搜索引擎无论如何都不会指向你的动态页面

（带正确的）。 br />

-

==================

删除 ; X"来自我的电子邮件地址

Jerry Stuckle

JDS计算机培训公司
js ******* @ attglobal.net

==================

感谢。你认为通过''index.php /？id = 1'给出一个完整网站外观的动态单页面会比索引更好吗？

每个页面用html写的同一个网站？有事告诉我

普通html网站上浮得更快。

ma ******* @ gmail.com 写道：

谢谢。你是否认为通过''index.php /？id = 1'给出一个完整网站外观的动态单页面会比每页写入的网页更好地编入索引HTML？有些东西告诉我
普通的HTML网站上浮得更快。

不一定。即使你有一个page1.html，对于搜索引擎，

您将如何链接到它？即使你确实链接到它。搜索

引擎会指向它 - 而不是index.php？id = 1。


但几乎所有的动态页面都有他们自己的网址。通过Apache的

mod_rewrite，" /page1.php"可能指向index.php？id = 1.


然而，这也不是我整体设计网站的方式。我让每个页面都有它自己的URL，并且该页面需要html和代码。包括公共标题和

页脚。


即便如此 - 大多数都是用PHP，Perl或ASP动态生成的。


但是如果你想了解更多关于搜索引擎并对它们进行优化的话，我建议你试试搜索引擎新闻组。这不是PHP问题。


-

==================

删除x来自我的电子邮件地址

Jerry Stuckle

JDS计算机培训公司
js ******* @ attglobal.net

==================

Because dynamic pages do not get indexed well in search engines, is
there a decent API out there to parse through the site and write pages
as plain html automatically? I noticed some WordPress and Blogger
writers have their posts served up as plain html.

Any ideas?

Thanks.

ma*******@gmail.com wrote:

Because dynamic pages do not get indexed well in search engines, is
there a decent API out there to parse through the site and write pages
as plain html automatically? I noticed some WordPress and Blogger
writers have their posts served up as plain html.

Any ideas?

Thanks.

What makes you think dynamic pages aren''t indexed well? I have several sites
with dynamic pages which are indexed quite well.

All the search engine sees is the generated HTML anyway. So what would be the
difference between that and static html pages (other than the latter will be out
of date minutes after they are generated). And the static pages will have
different URL''s, so the search engines wouldn''t point at your dynamic pages
(with the correct into) anyway.

--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp.
js*******@attglobal.net
==================

Thanks. Do you think a dynamic one-pager which gives an appearance of
a full site through ''index.php/?id=1'' would be indexed better than the
same site with every page written in html? Something is telling me
plain html sites float up faster.

ma*******@gmail.com wrote:

Thanks. Do you think a dynamic one-pager which gives an appearance of
a full site through ''index.php/?id=1'' would be indexed better than the
same site with every page written in html? Something is telling me
plain html sites float up faster.

Not necessarily. And even if you do have a "page1.html" for the search engines,
how are you going to link to it? And even if you do link to it. the search
engine will point to it - not to "index.php?id=1".

But virtually all of my dynamic pages do have their own URLs. Through Apache''s
mod_rewrite, "/page1.php" may well point to index.php?id=1.

However, it''s also not how I design my sites overall. I let each page have it''s
own url, with html and code as necessary for that page. Common headers and
footers are included.

Even so - most are dynamically generated in PHP, Perl or ASP.

But if you want to know more about search engines and optimizing for them, I
suggest you try a search engine news group. This isn''t a PHP question.

--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp.
js*******@attglobal.net
==================